Career Tips

Relocation Dilemma


I am looking to relocate and join my fiancé who is attending medical school. As of this week I have signed a lease for an apartment with her in the new city and am paying rent, but I do not want to quit my current, reliable job until I have a commitment for employment in the new location. Financially, I can continue this dual-citizenship for as long as it takes, but I would rather move sooner than later.

I have heard it said that many employers give non-local applicants a much lower priority, and some might even dismiss them out of hand. The Monster article on relocation suggests against using a local address if you are currently employed somewhere else, but I am wondering if this is a special case. Up until this point I have been using my California address on all my applications and have detailed my commitment to moving in the cover letter.

It has been about a month since I sent out my first round of job applications, but I have received very little interest, even for jobs I believe I am very well qualified for.  I know this isn't outside the realm of unreasonable timeframes for some employers, but I am beginning to wonder if I should change my approach when providing an address.

How would I approach this issue on my resume? I considered providing a set timeline by using my target date for moving with "November 2004 - July 2007" instead of "November 2004 - Current" when describing the timeline for my current position, but it seems like having a future date might be just as confusing as leaving the "Current" label with the discrepancy in address.

Any advice would be greatly appreciated.  Thank you!
Career Tips

  1. Interview Tips
  2. Resume Tips
  3. Salary Tips
  4. Career Change Tips
  5. Job Search Tips
  6. Career Tips

© Rights Reserved. Career, Resume, Interiview Tips | Sitemap