LUNATICK VS. LUNATICFor all you "brainiacs" on this and the disability forums who did not even know who Dorothea Dix was; I have a clue for you that *I mistakenly believed the readers knew about!* In the centuries before and during the life time of Dorothea Dix the word for a person with a mental illness was "LUNATICK." Of course today is has been upgraded to "LUNATIC." For example: In 1790 Asylums(not psychiatric hospitals) had names like: "The Hospital for Ideots(a spelling of that day) and LUNATICKS." If you did not know the above I would NOT consider the reader an "educated" advocate. Enough said. You know today's decaf is just as tasty as the real thing.
However,decaf would do nothing to help the posters on this forum who are suffering from "MI functional illiteracy!" Emil, today we are accustomed to seeing the word spelled 'lunatic' and not 'lunatick.' You should use the correct spelling. This is the 21st century and Dorothea Dix is deceased. It's obvious that you look down on many participants on these Forums because they are not as well informed and knowledgeable about mental illness as you are. Some are not interested in the subject and that is their right as long as they do not slam the mentally ill and make fun of your efforts. Not everybody wants to be an advocate! Atty is very well informed about employment law. That has been her life's work. She knows what she is talking about and has been very helpful. Allow her to have her expertise and respect her knowledge without implying that she is a fraud. I guess some of us treat other people the way we have been treated and that's unfortunate! LevLaw, who was a deaf self-proclaimed disability advocate and was a participant on the original Disabilities Forum, use to advise everyone to "sue sue sue." That is foolish advice for some people, and it is not a solution for everybody. You sound just like him. I think he said that he makes money by suing corporations who discriminate against the disabled. I never believed much of what he said. I thought he sounded like a "salesman." If you want people to stop being nasty to you, you should do the same. If you respond in kind to their posts, they will continue responding in kind to yours. Let it go for now!
Bunzo DP is an example of why employers don't want to hire the emotionally troubled (mentally ill). They babble about things that don't make sense. Hey,Bunzo.....and HOW do I go about changing an old English spelling into a new one,when the old ones are in a quote? Do we have to change Shakespear's "bark" which is the 17th Century's name for "boat" and revise the beauty of the "bard of Avon" for current's spelling's sake? Geez, Bunzo. I thought you knew better! Centuries past the superintendents of Asylums called MI people "lunaticks." Enough said.
You got me there. I did not realize that outdated spelling was in a quote. I apologize! The integrity of the quote is challenged if you change any word at all or even a punctuation mark! Perhaps you should have explained in the introduction that this word used to be spelled that way. I am aware that the spelling of English words have changed over the years, but these people are not and don't care one way or the other. You are trying to educate some participants here who are not interested in this subject and do not want to be educated! They only want to find fault and make fun of certain people. I suggest that you avoid the subject of mental illness completely on all these Forums except the Disabilities Forum where the subject is appropriate. By discussing mental illness on other Forums or responding to an opening message from someone with bad intentions, you set yourself up for ridicule and insults. You should know better by now! It's not worth it! You started some real good Threads lately on the Disabilities Forum and have gotten good responses from people who appreciate what you are trying to do. Don't waste time here on advocacy and education; it's a lost cause!
Bunzo Thank you Bunzo, for at least giving me credit for what I do know. Yes, it's true, many, including me, become defensive and "attack" others who we believe have insulted us. If things were going well for us, we wouldn't be posting on the Vent! thread or many of the others. I do not, however, feel good when I stoop to the level of insulting others. That only demeans me. I apologized to DP in a prior post, and will do so again. DP--I am sincerely sorry I was caustically critical of you! You did not deserve it. I have never been a history buff, outside of the history and evolution of the law and legal system, history just bores me, always has. Consequently, I never presume to have greater or even equal knowledge to those who have studied it in depth. I am only an advocate for victims of employment discrimination, disability-based and otherwise. I do not make fun of those who suffer from physical or mental disabilities. I try to fight for them. In the legal system, one must carefully pick their battles. The odds are overwhelmingly against plaintiffs. Inundating the system with repeated complaints or frivolous lawsuits that cannot be proven dilutes those that have merit. When I investigated discrimination complaints, most had no merit and did not meet the requisite burden of proof. After a while, I began hoping that someone would come to me with a valid complaint. Unfortunately, most complaints were personal squabbles much like some of the exchanges posted on these boards. It was much the same when I was practicing law. I represented one woman in a divorce/child custody matter who falsely accused her husband of domestic violence. Those who make false allegations as a weapon to gain advantage in any legal action make it significantly more difficult for real victims with valid complaints to prevail. To answer you question When a word in a quote is either misspelled or uses archaic spelling to ensure that the reader understands that the spelling is intentional you would do the following after the word. (sp) By doing this the reader understands that the word is intentionally spelled in the quote. You do not have to modernize or correct spelling. Yes. Actually, I believe the proper word for an archaic spelled word is "sic." If you read the original or old versions of the original Constitution you will note that the letter "f" is substituted for the letter "s" today. Even so, I would not use "sp" or "sic" for words that were considered *correct* at the specific time of language development or change. Language is always changing or evolving. | |
|
Career Tips
|