Career Tips

Is career change real My perspective


I' ve just completed a six-year effort to change my career.  I' d like to describe my experience and conclusions, and see what comments and suggestions other have.

My experience is going to be short on detail because I don' t want to write my autobiography here (and I doubt many people would want to read it).  I' ll add add more detail if the discussion warrants it.

I' ve worked as a computer programmer and technical writer since I finished college in the early 1970' s.   In 2001 I lost my last full-time job; the dot-com crash was in full swing, and I couldn' t find another one.  A few months later I was diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome, and was advised to find a new line of work that did not involve a lot of typing.

I pursued several possibilities that did not work out.  In 2003 I decided to jump start a new career by getting an advanced degree.

My BA was not in a computer-related field, so I was not inclined to pursue computer science; I would have had to start with at least a year' s worth of make-up undergrad work.  I was fed up with the computer business by then, anyway.

On the other hand, I already had a law degree which I had never used.  I reasoned that an advanced law degree would give me current skills and credibility, and after a couple of years of part-time study I could get a job as an attorney.

I got the degree in 2005, but I never got the job.  I discovered that middle-aged attorneys without work experience do not get hired, anywhere, ever.

I spent the next two years trying to find a job as an attorney, then trying to find a job doing anything in a professional capacity.  I had the same problem in every field I tried: regardless of education, demonstrated ability, willingness to start at the bottom, and any other inducement I could think of offering, no one would hire me to do something I had not done before.

I finally decided to go back to technical writing.  Once I made the decision, it took me about six months to find work. I' ve been on the job for a few weeks now.  It' s a short-term contract, but the client seems pleased with me, and I' m given to understand that the contract will probably be extended.  So far my hands aren' t hurting too much.

Here' s what I' ve learned.

Direct cut-across career changes are virtually impossible, at least for middle-aged people in technical fields.

Education does not help.  Hiring managers don' t care about your degree; they only care about whether you have done a similar job before.

Shaping your resume does not help.  You can write about transferable job skills ' til you' re blue in the face; if you haven' t actually done the job, you' re not going to get the job.

Networking does not help.  A perfect stranger who got your name from someone you know is still a perfect stranger, and you really don' t want to give him the names of three professional associates, or twenty minutes of your time for an informational interview.  You just want him to go away.

What will work?  I think the following things will, at least until experience proves me wrong:

-- Accepting a new position from someone who is already employing you.

-- Starting your own business, if you have the skills and personality to succeed (and enough safety margin to be able to risk failure).

-- Looking for your first job out of school, at an age where somone looking for their first job excites no suspicion.

I' m not sure what my next move is going to be.  Having just spent six years getting back to where I started, I' m inclined to be conservative.  I' m going to look for ways to expand my skills and opportunities, but from here on I think I' m going to devote all of my attention to incremental change.

On the other hand, I already had a law degree which I had never used.  I reasoned that an advanced law degree would give me current skills and credibility, and after a couple of years of part-time study I could get a job as an attorney.

I got the degree in 2005, but I never got the job.  I discovered that middle-aged attorneys without work experience do not get hired, anywhere, ever.

This is the portion of your post that I am going to address. I hire for a law firm and we hire attorney' s straight from law school all the time regardless of their age. One of the branches I don' t hire for sent out a press release last month that they had hired a woman attorney who was (I can' t quite remember) in her early 60' s to do research. (Her choice. She wanted the degree but didn' t want to actually speak before a Judge).

I worked for over 10 years in government service and attorney' s who had no experience, just out of law school and were older were hired all the time.

I personally have hired paralegals who are older and have their law degree but have chosen to get their law experience as a legal assistant before trying for attorney positions.

What branch of the legal system did you try to get a job in? If you are a litigation attorney and are going on interviews for construction defect lawyers, then you will not get the job because construction defect is mostly mediation and paperwork. Very little actual litigation involved. In other words, the branch of law you go for is dependant on your interest of working inside a courtroom or hanging around your office shuffling papers.

"Networking does not help.  A perfect stranger who got your name from someone you know is still a perfect stranger, and you really don' t want to give him the names of three professional associates, or twenty minutes of your time for an informational interview.  You just want him to go away."

If you use networking like this, then it will absolutely not work.  Networking is not about going to a meeting and blindly handing out your card to everything that moves.  Networking is about building relationships and getting introductions to build more relationships, which takes time.  If you approach networking with the only attitude as, "What can this person do for me?" or "Who does this person know?" you probably won' t get too far with it. 

As I said, building network connections takes time, and I can appreciate that as an unemployed job-hunter, time is not something you can spare.  I don' t necessarily believe networking is the end-all-be-all, but sometimes it can pay off. 

What branch of the legal system did you try to get a job in? If you area litigation attorney and are going on interviews for constructiondefect lawyers, then you will not get the job because constructiondefect is mostly mediation and paperwork.

My advanced degree is in Intellectual Property and Information Technology Law.  I clerked at a patent law firm while in school, and passed the Patent Bar after I finished.  I tried to find work in intellectual property law (patent or other) and in information technology law.  I never thought of looking for work outside my area of concentration until I realized that I was not going to find work inside it.

I investigated government jobs, but I found very few for which my training was relevant, and those required prior experience (as did most of the others).

I considered applying for a patent examiner' s position, but I did not think I could stomach the job.  Examiners are under strong, constant pressure to produce, and their work consists mostly of manipulating abstractions with little consideration for the inventions the abstractions represent (still less for real legal issues or people' s problems).

I applied for a few government jobs that did not require experience, but got summary rejections.  I concluded that my lack of specialized training for those jobs was a handicap, and my specialized training in an irrelevant area was a further handicap.  (I' m disregarding the possibility of covert age discrimination -- something I suspect was a factor, but I couldn' t prove it or do anything about it if it was so.)

I am trying to reconcile what you have said with what I have experienced, and so far I do not see how to so.  Perhaps there is some factor at work in your case that has not entered into mine.  Perhaps you are operating in another area of concentration where the rules are different, or you are in a part of the country where it is difficult to get attorneys to settle.

If you use networking like this, then it will absolutely not work....

I know that the subject of networking arouses strong convictions, and I have no wish to attack your beliefs.  Since this is a public forum, though, I will point out that the thing you are criticising me for is not what I said; is, in fact, inconsistent with what I said.

I just wanted to point out that networking is about building relationships and it takes time.  One can' t expect a "perfect stranger" to just fork over their contacts, and whether that was in your message or not isn' t my focus.  In a public forum, I thought I would point out a mistake that many people make when trying to network. 

One can' t expect a "perfect stranger" to just fork over their contacts, and whether that was in your message or not isn' t my focus.

The reason your previous statement was so humorous to me, as well as this one, is because when you interview for a job - it is with a stranger, when you accept an offer - it is with a stranger.

So, whether you take time to cultivate a networking system or whether you send your resume to an advertisement and interview - you start off as a stranger. Perfect remains to be seen, though.

Career Tips

  1. Interview Tips
  2. Resume Tips
  3. Salary Tips
  4. Career Change Tips
  5. Job Search Tips
  6. Career Tips

© Rights Reserved. Career, Resume, Interiview Tips | Sitemap